Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||In 1931 Kurt Gödel proved two theorems about the completeness and consistency of first-order arithmetic. Their implications for philosophy are profound. Many fashionable tenets are shown to be untenable: many traditional intuitions are vindicated by incontrovertible arguments|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Zofia Adamowicz & Teresa Bigorajska (2001). Existentially Closed Structures and Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):349-356.
Raymond M. Smullyan (1992). Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems. Oxford University Press.
Matthias Baaz (ed.) (2011). Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Mathematics: Horizons of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Steiner (2001). Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):257-279.
George Boolos (1995). Introductory Note to Kurt Gödel's ``Some Basic Theorems on the Foundations of Mathematics and Their Implications''. In Solomon Feferman (ed.), Kurt Gödel, Collected Works. Oxford University Press.
N. Shankar (1994). Metamathematics, Machines, and Gödel's Proof. Cambridge University Press.
Andrzej Mostowski (1952/1982). Sentences Undecidable in Formalized Arithmetic: An Exposition of the Theory of Kurt Gödel. Greenwood Press.
Francesco Berto (2009). The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #14,377 of 739,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #9,208 of 739,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?