The Lay-out of Arguments
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Arguments have been much misunderstood. Not only has it been assumed that they must be deductive, but it has been assumed also that, although often expressed in loose and elliptical form, they must be capable, if they are valid at all, of being expressed with absolute precision, as a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the action in question to be appropriate. Mathematical arguments are capable of being stated precisely, and it has long been a reproach to workers in other disciplines that they do not manage to achieve equal precision in their work. The assumption is made that absolute precision is in principle available, and it is only a lack of rigour by practitioners in the non-mathematical disciplines that prevents them casting their arguments in satisfactory form, and the philosopher should, therefore, reconstruct arguments to conform with these requirements, evaluating those that do, and rejecting any that do not.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jean Paul van Bendegem & Bart van Kerkhove (2009). Mathematical Arguments in Context. Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.
Matthew W. McKeon (2013). On the Rationale for Distinguishing Arguments From Explanations. Argumentation 27 (3):283-303.
Collin Anderson, Scott Aiken & John Casey (2012). You Would Sing Another Tune. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):39-46.
Oskari Kuusela (2008). Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Hugh Lehman (1985). Equal Pay for Equal Work in the Third World. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (6):487 - 491.
André Juthe (2005). Argument by Analogy. Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Hendrik Hart (1987). Kai Nielsen's Philosophy & Atheism. Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):334-346.
Hugo Mercier & Brent Strickland (2012). Evaluating Arguments From the Reaction of the Audience. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):365 - 378.
Alec Fisher (2004). The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Juha Saatsi (2009). Form Vs. Content-Driven Arguments for Realism. In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan
Elke Brendel (2007). Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Ariela Tubert (2010). Constitutive Arguments. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):656-666.
Kevin C. Klement, Deductive and Inductive Arguments. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sandra L. Menssen & Thomas D. Sullivan (1995). Must God Create? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):321-341.
Meena Krishnamurthy (2012). Reconceiving Rawls's Arguments for Equal Political Liberty and Its Fair Value. Social Theory and Practice 38 (2):258-278.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads2 ( #653,184 of 1,789,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?