The Lay-out of Arguments

Arguments have been much misunderstood. Not only has it been assumed that they must be deductive, but it has been assumed also that, although often expressed in loose and elliptical form, they must be capable, if they are valid at all, of being expressed with absolute precision, as a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the action in question to be appropriate. Mathematical arguments are capable of being stated precisely, and it has long been a reproach to workers in other disciplines that they do not manage to achieve equal precision in their work. The assumption is made that absolute precision is in principle available, and it is only a lack of rigour by practitioners in the non-mathematical disciplines that prevents them casting their arguments in satisfactory form, and the philosopher should, therefore, reconstruct arguments to conform with these requirements, evaluating those that do, and rejecting any that do not.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Collin Anderson, Scott Aiken & John Casey (2012). You Would Sing Another Tune. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):39-46.
    Oskari Kuusela (2008). Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
    Hugh Lehman (1985). Equal Pay for Equal Work in the Third World. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (6):487 - 491.
    Hendrik Hart (1987). Kai Nielsen's Philosophy & Atheism. Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):334-346.
    Elke Brendel (2007). Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
    Ariela Tubert (2010). Constitutive Arguments. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):656-666.
    Kevin C. Klement, Deductive and Inductive Arguments. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    2 ( #258,148 of 1,088,398 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)


    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.