David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 53 (205):363- (1978)
Some of my best friends are women, but I would not want my sister to marry one of them. Modern-minded persons criticize me for manifesting such out-dated prejudices, and would like to send me to Coventry for a compulsory course of reindoctrination. They may be right. It could conceivably be the case that in due course the Sex Discrimination Act will be tightened up, even to the extent of our recognizing that there are no ‘good reasons why the State should not recognize contracts which are in all respects like marriage, except for the sex of the parties concerned’. We can envisage a society so enlightened that the relations between men and women will be purely platonic and it will be a matter of no concern whether two people are members of the opposite sex or not: or, alternatively, our feelings could be so completely homogenized, that it will make no difference to an emotional relationship whether Leslie and Julian have only one Y-chromosome between them, or two, or none at all. In that event I shall be shown to be wrong, and my critics entitled to erect a monument to female equality on my grave. But I have doubts, and suspect that long after I am dead men will go on falling in love with women and women will continue to find their hearts wooed and won by men. And this fact, if it is a fact, makes a profound difference to our social institutions. I want to follow out the logic of social differentiation, relying as little as I can on putative facts about the differences between the sexes. Scientifically attested knowledge is scarce in this field. Many academics take refuge in a safe suspension of judgment, but this is a craven dereliction of duty. We have yet to develop an adequate theory of knowledge in social matters, and only by thrashing out the apparently telling arguments on this and similar issues can we clear our minds about the nature of social knowledge. Moreover, if those who might argue rationally draw back from doing so, they leave the field clear for others who suffer from fewer inhibitions and fewer scruples. And finally, serious social consequences can follow from public confusion about the logic of a situation, and what things are possible and what desirable. There is a danger that in our attempts to remedy the real wrongs done to women we shall only succeed, as with much modern legislation, in making a bad case worse
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Edwin T. Layton (1976). Technology and Science, or "Vive La Petite Difference". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:173 - 184.
V. H. Dudman (1989). Vive la Revolution! Mind 98 (392):591-603.
Luc Brisson (1976). La Métaphore Vive de Paul Ricoeur. Dialogue 15 (01):133-147.
Charles Reagan (1976). La Métaphore Vive. International Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):359-362.
Nathalie Frogneux (2005). La résistance vive du corps dans l''Essai' de Maine de Biran. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 103 (1):65-81.
John B. Callicott (1992). La Nature Est Morte, Vive la Nature! Hastings Center Report 22 (5):17-23.
Gilles Deleuze (1994). Difference and Repetition. Athlone Press.
David Hunter (2009). Beliefs and Dispositions. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:243-262.
Luke Glynn (2013). Causal Foundationalism, Physical Causation, and Difference-Making. Synthese 190 (6):1017-1037.
Maxine Baca Zinn & Bonnie Thorton Dill (1996). Theorizing Difference From Multiracial Feminism. Feminist Studies 22 (2):321-331.
Alan Bass (2006). Interpretation and Difference: The Strangeness of Care. Stanford University Press.
Endre Kiss (2008). Construing Identity Under the Role of Difference. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 17:75-87.
Xiangjun Li (2007). An Explanation of the Confucian Idea of Difference. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):488-502.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads5 ( #338,493 of 1,700,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?