Interpreted logical forms, belief attribution, and the dynamic lexicon
In K. Jaczszolt (ed.), The Pragmatics of Propositional Attitudes. Elsevier (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLenny Clapp (2002). Davidson's Program and Interpreted Logical Forms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):261-297.
A. Baltag & S. Smets (2008). A Dynamic-Logical Perspective on Quantum Behavior. Studia Logica 89 (2):187 - 211.
José Eduardo Porcher (2012). Against the Deflationary Account of Self-Deception. Humana.Mente 20:67-84.
Michael Cholbi (2006). Moral Belief Attribution: A Reply to Roskies. Philosophical Psychology 19 (5):629 – 638.
M. Dusche (1995). Interpreted Logical Forms as Objects of the Attitudes. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (4):301-315.
Richard K. Larson & Peter Ludlow (1993). Interpreted Logical Forms. Synthese 95 (3):305-355.
J. Edwards (1999). Interpreted Logical Forms and Knowing Your Own Mind. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (2):169-90.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-04-06Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
