David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Perspectives 12 (S12):141-66 (1998)
In this paper, we outline an approach to giving extensional truth-theoretic semantics for what have traditionally been seen as opaque sentential contexts. We outline an approach to providing a compositional truth-theoretic semantics for opaque contexts which does not require quantifying over intensional entities of any kind, and meets standard objections to such accounts. The account we present aims to meet the following desiderata on a semantic theory T for opaque contexts: (D1) T can be formulated in a first-order extensional language; (D2) T does not require quantification over intensional entitiesi.e., meanings, propositions, properties, relations, or the likein its treatment of opaque contexts; (D3) T captures the entailment relations that hold in virtue of form between sentences in the language for which it is a theory; (D4) T has a finite number of axioms. If the approach outlined here is correct, it resolves a longstanding complex of problems in metaphysics, the philosophy of mind and the philosophy of language.
|Keywords||Propositional Attitudes Intensional Contexts Sententialism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Saka (2013). Quotation. Philosophy Compass 8 (10):935-949.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (2006). Quotation, Context Sensitivity, Signs and Expressions. Philosophical Issues 16 (1):43–64.
Steven Gross (2005). The Biconditional Doctrine: Contra Kölbel on a “Dogma” of Davidsonian Semantics. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 62 (2):189 - 210.
Kirk Ludwig (2003). François Recanati's Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):481–488.
Steven Gross (2005). The Biconditional Doctrine: Contra Kölbel on a “Dogma” of Davidsonian Semantics. Erkenntnis 62 (2):189-210.
Similar books and articles
J. M. Orenduff (1977). Are Modal Contexts Referentially Opaque? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (1):128-132.
Naomi Reshotko (1996). Do Explanatory Desire Attributions Generate Opaque Contexts? Ratio 9 (2):153-170.
Kenneth T. Barnes (1972). Hintikka's Argument for the Need for Quantifying Into Opaque Contexts. Philosophical Studies 23 (6):385 - 392.
L. Jonathan Cohen (1960). A Formalisation of Referentially Opaque Contexts. Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (3):193-202.
Teresa Robertson (2002). Are Modal Contexts Opaque? Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (1):79-88.
Michael Byrd (1974). Must We Quantify Into Opaque Contexts? Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):401 - 409.
Georgette Ioup (1977). Specificity and the Interpretation of Quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (2):233 - 245.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #76,896 of 1,911,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #42,204 of 1,911,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?