Inquiry 50 (6):622-638 (2007)
|Abstract||We sketch an account according to which the semantic concepts themselves are not pathological and the pathologies that attend the semantic predicates arise because of the intention to impose on them a role they cannot fulfill, that of expressing semantic concepts for a language that includes them. We provide a simplified model of the account and argue in its light that (i) a consequence is that our meaning intentions are unsuccessful, and such semantic predicates fail to express any concept, and that (ii) in light of this it is incorrect to characterize the pathology simply as semantic inconsistency; a more nuanced view of the problem is needed. We also show that the defects of the semantic predicates need not undercut the use of a truth theory in a compositional semantics for a language containing them because the meaning theory per se need not involve commitment to the axioms of the truth theory it exploits.|
|Keywords||Truth Semantic Paradoxes|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hannes Leitgeb (2005). What Truth Depends On. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (2):155-192.
Nic Damnjanovic (2010). New Wave Deflationism. In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.
Donald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
Claire Horisk (2007). The Expressive Role of Truth in Truth-Conditional Semantics. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):535–557.
Donald Davidson (1994). What is Quine's View of Truth? Inquiry 37 (4):437 – 440.
ME Kalderon (1997). The Transparency of Truth. Mind 106 (423):475-497.
Emil Badici & Kirk Ludwig (2007). The Concept of Truth and the Semantics of the Truth Predicate. Inquiry 50 (6):622 – 638.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #34,124 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,324 of 549,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?