Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):385-400 (2006)
|Abstract||The author argues that the standard view about language, seen as fairly stable abstract system of communication, is a myth. Standard view is badly mistaken and the alternative picture is offered in which there is a core part of our linguistic competence that is fixed by biology and this provides a basic skeleton which is fleshed out in different ways on a conversion-by-conversation basis. Why certain people communicate with each other? The answer to this question is not because they speak the same language. We cannot see how communication can emerge from the standard picture of language if we do not start investigating the nature of our linguistic coordination strategies, since there is not a thing there -- a language -- that helps us to communicate|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Gauker, Language and Thought. A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Barry C. Smith (2006). What I Know When I Know a Language. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Stefano Predelli (2010). Malapropisms and the Simple Picture of Communication. Mind and Language 25 (3):329-345.
Gilbert Harman (1975). Language, Thought, and Communication. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:270-298.
Peter Carruthers (1996). Language, Thought, and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Valeria Lelli (2011). The Body Language: A Semiotic Reading of Szasz’ Anti-Psychiatry. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (2):34-36.
Peter Ludlow (2006). The Myth of Human Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):385-400.
Added to index2010-07-21
Total downloads34 ( #40,578 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?