David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 11 (2):85 – 101 (2001)
This paper evaluates Tu Wei-ming's proposal that the Confucian ideal model of human society should be viewed as a fiduciary community. To do the evaluation, I provide a systematic elaboration of Tu's proposal, which is essentially absent in Tu's writings, and a systematic explication of the Confucian theory of fiduciarity, which is supposed to be the theoretical foundation of Tu's proposal but is completely absent in the studies of Confucianism, including Tu's own. On the basis of these studies, I conclude that the notion of fiduciary community is entailed by the Confucian tradition; tapping the resource of the Confucian tradition for appreciating, supporting and justifying a properly defined model of fiduciary society is practically relevant and important to the modern world; however, given Tu's own definition, the model of fiduciary community does not sufficiently characterise the Confucian ideal society. In the end, I suggest a new way to study Confucian social ideals.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A. T. Nuyen (2011). Balancing Rights and Trust: Towards a Fiduciary Common Future. Asian Philosophy 21 (1):83-95.
Similar books and articles
J. C. Cleary (ed.) (1991). Worldly Wisdom: Confucian Teachings of the Ming Dynasty. Distributed in the U.S. By Random House.
Yen-Zen Tsai (2008). Selfhood and Fiduciary Community: A Smithian Reading of Tu Weiming's Confucian Humanism. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):349-365.
Sze-Kar Wan (2008). The Viability of Confucian Transcendence: Grappling with Tu Weiming's Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (4):407-421.
Hans-Georg Moeller (2004). New Confucianism and the Semantics of Individuality. A Luhmannian Analysis. Asian Philosophy 14 (1):25 – 39.
Xinzhong Yao & Weiming Tu (eds.) (2010). Confucian Studies: Critical Concepts in Asian Philosophy. Routledge.
Ji-wei Ci (1999). The Confucian Relational Concept of the Person and its Modern Predicament. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):325-346.
Thomas A. Wilson (1995). Genealogy of the Way: The Construction and Uses of the Confucian Tradition in Late Imperial China. Stanford University Press.
Zhao Tingyang & Yan Xin (2008). The Self and the Other: An Unanswered Question in Confucian Theory. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (2):163 - 176.
Ted Slingerland (1996). The Conception of Ming in Early Confucian Thought. Philosophy East and West 46 (4):567-581.
Eske Møllgaard (2007). Is Tu Wei-Ming Confucian? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (4):397-411.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #223,851 of 1,696,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #250,163 of 1,696,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?