David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Moral relativism attracts and repels. What is defensible in it and what is to be rejected? Do we as human beings have no shared standards by which we can understand one another? Can we abstain from judging one another's practices? Do we truly have divergent views about what constitutes good and evil, virtue and vice, harm and welfare, dignity and humiliation, or is there some underlying commonality that trumps it all? These questions turn up everywhere, from Montaigne's essay on cannibals, to the UN Declaration of Human Rights, to the debate over female genital mutilation. They become ever more urgent with the growth of mass immigration, the rise of religious extremism, the challenges of Islamist terrorism, the rise of identity politics, and the resentment at colonialism and the massive disparities of wealth and power between North and South. Are human rights and humanitarian interventions just the latest form of cultural imperialism? By what right do we judge particular practices as barbaric? Who are the real barbarians? In this provocative new book, the distinguished social theorist Steven Lukes takes an incisive and enlightening look at these and other challenging questions and considers the very foundations of what we believe, why we believe it, and whether there is a profound discord between "us" and "them."
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$5.95 new (67% off) $13.62 direct from Amazon (25% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1500.R37.L85 2008|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael S. Merry & Doret J. De Ruyter (2011). The Relevance of Cosmopolitanism for Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 40 (1):1-18.
Bob Plant (2011). Religion, Relativism, and Wittgenstein's Naturalism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):177 - 209.
Iddo Tavory (2011). The Question of Moral Action: A Formalist Position. Sociological Theory 29 (4):272 - 293.
William F. Birdsall (2011). Human Capabilities and Information and Communication Technology: The Communicative Connection. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 13 (2):93-106.
Robert William Garner (2011). Animal Welfare, Ethics and the Work of the International Whaling Commission. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):279-290.
Similar books and articles
John W. Cook (1999). Morality and Cultural Differences. Oxford University Press.
Maria Baghramian (2004). Relativism. Routledge.
John Ladd (1973). Ethical Relativism. Belmont, Calif.,Wadsworth Pub. Co..
James Beebe (2010). Moral Relativism in Context. Noûs 44 (4):691-724.
Graham Mark Long (2004). Relativism and the Foundations of Liberalism. Imprint Academic.
Ruth Macklin (1999). Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Charles Sayward (1988). System Relativism. Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Steven D. Hales (ed.) (2011). A Companion to Relativism. Wiley-Blackwell.
Mohammad A. Shomali (2001). Ethical Relativism: An Analysis of the Foundations of Morality. Distributed by Saqi Books.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads17 ( #227,428 of 1,934,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,779 of 1,934,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?