Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels
International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121 - 139 (2009)
| Abstract | In this article I examine several criticisms of the concept of vulnerability. Rather than rejecting the concept, however, I argue that a sufficiently rich understanding of vulnerability is essential to bioethics. The challenges of international research in developing countries require an understanding of how new vulnerabilities arise from conditions of economic, social and political exclusion. A serious shortcoming of current conceptions of vulnerability in research ethics is the tendency to treat vulnerability as a label fixed on a particular subpopulation. My paper examines the role of this "label" metaphor in current statements of research ethics. In contrast to this prevailing "label" metaphor, my own positive account of vulnerability develops a dynamic way of understanding the structure of the concept of vulnerability based on the idea of "layers of vulnerability." I examine several cases involving women, as they are sometimes labeled as a vulnerable population and sometimes not. My analysis demonstrates the essential role of this revised concept of vulnerability in bioethics and research ethics. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWendy Rogers & Carolyn McLeod (2012). Introduction. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):1-10.
Kate Brown (2011). 'Vulnerability': Handle with Care. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (3):313-321.
Carol Levine, Ruth Faden, Christine Grady, Dale Hammerschmidt, Lisa Eckenwiler & Jeremy Sugarman (2004). The Limitations of "Vulnerability" as a Protection for Human Research Participants. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):44 – 49.
Louis Eeckhoudt & Béatrice Rey (2011). Risk Vulnerability: A Graphical Interpretation. Theory and Decision 71 (2):227-234.
Erinn Gilson (2011). Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression. Hypatia 26 (2):308-332.
Ruth Macklin (2012). A Global Ethics Approach to Vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):64-81.
Robyn Bluhm (2012). Vulnerability, Health, and Illness. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):147-161.
Stephen Napier (2010). Vulnerable Embryos. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):781-810.
S. Napier (2009). A Regulatory Argument Against Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (5):496-508.
Lars Alberth (2013). Body Techniques of Vulnerability: The Generational Order and the Body in Child Protection Services. Human Studies 36 (1):67-88.
Nancy J. Annaromao (1996). A Feminist Interpretation of Vulnerability. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (1):1-7.
Havi Carel (2009). A Reply to 'Towards an Understanding of Nursing as a Response to Human Vulnerability' by Derek Sellman: Vulnerability and Illness. Nursing Philosophy 10 (3):214-219.
Ruth Macklin (2003). Bioethics, Vulnerability, and Protection. Bioethics 17 (5-6):472--486.
Jessica Robyn Cadwallader (2012). (Un)Expected Suffering: The Corporeal Specificity of Vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):105-125.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads27 ( #46,566 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
