Nonconceptual content and the sound of music

Mind and Language 18 (4):402-426 (2003)
: I present an argument for the existence of nonconceptual representational content. The argument is compatible with McDowell's defence of conceptualism against those arguments for nonconceptual content that draw upon claims about the fine‐grainedness of experience. I present a case for nonconceptual content that concentrates on the idea that experience can possess representational content that cannot perform the function of conceptual content, namely figure in the subject's reasons for belief and action. This sort of argument for nonconceptual content is best achieved with examples from auditory perception, especially our perception of music
Keywords Conceptualism  Language  Music  Representational
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00234
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John McDowell (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Tom Roberts (2012). Exploring Enactive Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):239-254.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

61 ( #55,904 of 1,726,994 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #147,216 of 1,726,994 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.