David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):239–251 (2007)
The harm thesis says that death may harm the individual who dies. The posthumous harm thesis says that posthumous events may harm those who die. Epicurus rejects both theses, claiming that there is no subject who is harmed, no clear harm which is received, and no clear time when any harm is received. Feldman rescues the harm thesis with solutions to Epicurus' three puzzles based on his own version of the deprivation account of harm. But many critics, among them Lamont, Grey, Feit and Bradley, have rejected Feldman's solution to the timing puzzle, offering their own solutions in its place. I discuss these solutions to the timing puzzle, and defend the view that while we are alive we may incur harm for which death and posthumous events are responsible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ben Bradley (2004). When is Death Bad for the One Who Dies? Noûs 38 (1):1–28.
Neil Feit (2002). The Time of Death's Misfortune. Noûs 36 (3):359–383.
Fred Feldman (1991). Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death. Philosophical Review 100 (2):205-227.
Fred Feldman (2000). The Termination Thesis. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):98–115.
William Grey (1999). Epicurus and the Harm of Death. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):358 – 364.
Citations of this work BETA
Joyce L. Jenkins (2011). Dead and Gone. Utilitas 23 (2):228-234.
Similar books and articles
Brooke Alan Trisel (2007). What is a Premature Death? Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 11:54-82.
Steven Luper (2009). The Philosophy of Death. Cambridge University Press.
Joel Feinberg (1984). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Samuel C. Rickless (2011). The Moral Status of Enabling Harm. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Douglas W. Portmore (2007). Desire Fulfillment and Posthumous Harm. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):27 - 38.
James Stacey Taylor (2008). Harming the Dead. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:185-202.
Stephan Blatti (2012). Death's Distinctive Harm. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):317-30.
John Martin Fischer (ed.) (1993). The Metaphysics of Death. Stanford University Press.
Steven Luper (2004). Posthumous Harm. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #60,772 of 1,096,342 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #84,313 of 1,096,342 )
How can I increase my downloads?