Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The Hamiltonian structure of General Relativity (GR), for both metric and tetrad gravity in a definite continuous family of space-times, is fully exploited in order to show that: i) the "Hole Argument" can be bypassed by means of a specific "physical individuation" of point-events of the space-time manifold M^4 in terms of the "autonomous degrees of freedom" of the vacuum gravitational field (Dirac observables), while the "Leibniz equivalence" is reduced to differences in the "non-inertial appearances" (connected to gauge variables) of the same phenomena. ii) the chrono-geometric structure of a solution of Einstein equations for given, gauge-fixed, initial data (a "3-geometry" satisfying the relevant constraints on the Cauchy surface), can be interpreted as an "unfolding" in mathematical global time of a sequence of "achronal 3-spaces" characterized by "dynamically determined conventions" about distant simultaneity. This result stands out as an important conceptual difference with respect to the standard chrono-geometrical view of Special Relativity (SR) and allows, in a specific sense, for an "endurantist" interpretations of ordinary physical objects in GR.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Roger Jones (1980). Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Tim Maudlin (2010). Time, Topology and Physical Geometry. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):63-78.
R. M. Nugayev (1987). The Genesis and Structure of Models in the Modern Theory of Gravity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):84 – 104.
Jill North (2009). The “Structure” of Physics. Journal of Philosophy 106 (2):57-88.
Harvey R. Brown (1997). On the Role of Special Relativity in General Relativity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):67 – 81.
Luca Lusanna & Massimo Pauri, General Covariance and the Objectivity of Space-Time Point-Events: The Physical Role of Gravitational and Gauge Degrees of Freedom - DRAFT.
Massimo Pauri & Michele Vallisneri, Ephemeral Point-Events: Is There a Last Remnant of Physical Objectivity ?
Luca Lusanna & Massimo Pauri (2006). Explaining Leibniz Equivalence as Difference of Non-Inertial Appearances: Dis-Solution of the Hole Argument and Physical Individuation of Point-Events. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (4):692-725.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,769 of 751,289 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 751,289 )
How can I increase my downloads?