Arrhenius vs. Ehrlich on immunochemistry: Decisions about scientific progress in the context of the nobel prize
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (2) (1992)
This study forms part of a larger research project examining the election process for the Nobel prizes for Physiology or Medicine at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, and the role and function of the prizes in early 20th century Swedish and international medicine. The purpose of the study is to clarify the decision-making process which led to the Nobel prize for Paul Ehrlich in 1908, for work on immunity. His award was preceded by the most dramatic conflict within the prize authority concerning any prizewinner prior to World War I, and thus is apt to illuminate both the implicit and explicit criteria and the strategies used in the prize deliberations.Ehrlich's chemical ideas on the immune response were criticized by the physical chemist Svante Arrhenius who recommended the application of his disciplines's methods and principles on immunological problems. This criticisms were brought into the Nobel prize debate by J.E. Johansson, a physiologist who asserted that Ehrlich's research was of little scientific value and therefore not worthy of a prize. Yet the majority of the Institute, led by its chairmam, the chemist K.A.H. Mörner, succeeded in awarding Ehrlich.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laurence Foss (1998). The Biomedical Paradigm and the Nobel Prize: Is It Time for a Change? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6):621-644.
Douglas Allchin (2002). To Err and Win a Nobel Prize: Paul Boyer, ATP Synthase and the Emergence of Bioenergetics. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 35 (1):149 - 172.
B. I. B. Lindahl (1992). Discovery, Theory Change, and the Nobel Prize: On the Mechanisms of Scientific Evolution. An Introduction. Theoretical Medicine 13 (2):97-116.
Hub Zwart (2010). The Nobel Prize as a Reward Mechanism in the Genomics Era: Anonymous Researchers, Visible Managers and the Ethics of Excellence. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (3):299-312.
Nicolay Gertchev (2011). The Economic Nobel Prize. Libertarian Papers 3.
Frank Portugal (2010). Oswald T. Avery: Nobel Laureate or Noble Luminary? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):558-570.
Rachel Lewinsohn (2003). Prophet in His Own Country: Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (4):532-549.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #241,855 of 1,907,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,049 of 1,907,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?