In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Minds and Persons. Cambridge University Press (2003)
|Abstract||(3) A compatibilist needs to explain how free will can co-exist with determinism, paradigmatically by offering an analysis of ‘free’ action that is demonstrably compatible with determinism. (Here is the late Roderick Chisholm, in defense of irreducible or libertarian agent-causation: ‘Now if you can analyze such statements as “Jones killed his uncle” into event-causation statements, then you may have earned the right to make jokes about the agent as cause. But if you haven’t done this, and if all the same you do believe such things as that I raised my arm and that Jolns [sic] killed his uncle, and if moreover you still think it’s a joke to talk about the agent as cause, then, I’m afraid, the joke is entirely on you.’).|
|Keywords||Compatibilism Free Will|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Randel Koons (2002). Is Hard Determinism a Form of Compatibilism? Philosophical Forum 33 (1):81-99.
Gregory Harding (1997). Free Will and Determinism: Why Compatibilism is False. Erkenntnis 47 (3):311-349.
Kevin Timpe, Free Will. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Manuel Vargas (2010). The Revisionist Turn: A Brief History of Recent Work on Free Will. In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave.
Shaun Nichols (2008). Great Philosophical Debates. Teaching Co..
Patrick Francken (1993). Incompatibilism, Nondeterministic Causation, and the Real Problem of Free Will. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:37-63.
Laura W. Ekstrom (2003). Free Will, Chance, and Mystery. Philosophical Studies 22 (2):153-80.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #14,658 of 548,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,649 of 548,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?