Pot bites Kettle: A reply to Miller
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):212 – 213 (1991)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. J. F. Williams (1982). Reply to Miller. Analysis 42 (4):189 - 190.
Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller (2005). Paul Litton and Franklin G. Miller Reply to Madeline M. Motta. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):635-635.
Nancy M. Kettle (2003). Informed Consent in Clinical Practice. HEC Forum 15 (1):42-54.
G. Hellman (1992). Supervenience/Determination a Two-Way Street? Yes, but One of the Ways is the Wrong Way! Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):42-47.
David Rayfield (1974). On Miller's Paradoxes and Circles. Inquiry 17 (1-4):461-464.
Emily Edwards Kettle (1957). Who Am I? New York, Exposition Press.
David Edmonds (2010). Philosophy Bites. Oxford University Press.
Richard B. Miller (1989). Dog Bites Man: A Defence of Modal Realism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (4):476 – 478.
Robert M. Sade (2007). On Moralizing and Hidden Agendas: The Pot and the Kettle in Political Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):42 – 43.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,063 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
