Graduate studies at Western
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:471 - 485 (1990)
|Abstract||This paper was presented at a session on "Three views of experiment: Atomic parity violations," in which Allan Franklin's study of an episode in the recent history of particle physics was discussed and criticized. Franklin argues in favor of what he calls "the evidence model," a general claim to the effect that physicists' theory choices are based on valid experimental evidence. He contrasts his position to that of the social constructivists, who, according to him, insist that social and cognitive interests, and not the evidence, explains physicists' practical and theoretical judgments. My paper argues that Franklin miscasts the debate between experimental realism and social constructivism, because constructivists do not insist that evidence has no role whatsoever in experimental practice. My position draws lessons from Wittgenstein's later philosophy and ethnomethodological studies of scientific practices. The paper does not aim to support social constructivism against Franklin's arguments, so much as to suggest that the terms of the realist-constructivist debate provide a poor context for the examination of the temporal production of experiments and observations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Allan Franklin (1990). Experiment, Right or Wrong. Cambridge University Press.
Andy Pickering (1990). Reason Enough? More on Parity-Violation Experiments and Electroweak Gauge Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:459 - 469.
Robert Ackermann (1990). Allan Franklin, Right or Wrong. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:451 - 457.
Allan Franklin (2002). Selectivity and Discord: Two Problems of Experiment. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Allan Franklin (2002). Fisica y Experimentacion. Theoria 17 (2):221-242.
Wendy S. Parker (2008). Franklin, Holmes, and the Epistemology of Computer Simulation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):165 – 183.
Allan Franklin (1990). Do Mutants Have to Be Slain, or Do They Die of Natural Causes?: The Case of Atomic Parity Violation Experiments. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:487 - 494.
Allan Franklin (2007). Experiment in Physics. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Allan Franklin (1985). Book Review:Scientific Explanation and Atomic Physics Edward M. MacKinnon. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (3):481-.
Allan Franklin & Colin Howson (1988). It Probably is a Valid Experimental Result: A Bayesian Approach to the Epistemology of Experiment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):419-427.
Allan Franklin (1986). Experiment and the Development of the Theory of Weak Interactions: Fermi's Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:163 - 179.
David Wÿss Rudge (1998). A Bayesian Analysis of Strategies in Evolutionary Biology. Perspectives on Science 6 (4):341-360.
Ben Almassi (2009). Conflicting Expert Testimony and the Search for Gravitational Waves. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Colin Howson & Allan Franklin (1991). Maher, Mendeleev and Bayesianism. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):574-585.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?