David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Geography 1 (2):223 – 242 (1998)
Geography is experiencing a 'moral turn' in its research interests and practices. There is also a flourishing interest in animal geographies that intersects this turn, and is concurrent with wider scholarly efforts to reincorporate animals and nature” into our ethical and social theories. This article intervenes in a dispute between Michael Dear and Richard Symanski. The dispute is over the culling of wild horses in Australia, and I intervene to explore how geography deepens our moral understanding of the animallhuman dialectic. I begin by situating the inquiry into ethics and animals in geography. Next, I provide a synopsis of Dear and Symanski's comments on 'animal rights', followed in 'turn by discussions of moral value and value paradigms. I then introduce a value paradigm termed geocentrism as a geographical account of our moral relations to animals. Finally, I discuss the wider significance of this debate for geographical ethics, moral philosophy and social theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frank Kupper & Tjard Cock Bunindeg (2011). Deliberating Animal Values: A Pragmatic—Pluralistic Approach to Animal Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):431-450.
David M. Smith (1998). Geography and Moral Philosophy: Some Common Ground. Philosophy and Geography 1 (1):7 – 33.
R. G. Frey (1997). Moral Community and Animal Research in Medicine. Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):123 – 136.
David DeGrazia (2002). Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Claire Molloy (2011). Popular Media and Animals. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mark Rowlands (1998). Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defence. St. Martin's Press.
E. Cohen Nina, W. A. Brom Frans & N. Stassen Elsbeth (2009). Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment: An Empirical Model to Describe Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment on the Culling of Healthy Animals During an Animal Disease Epidemic. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (4).
Nina E. Cohen, Frans W. A. Brom & Elsbeth N. Stassen (2009). Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment: An Empirical Model to Describe Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment on the Culling of Healthy Animals During an Animal Disease Epidemic. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (4):341-359.
Peter Carruthers (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #176,067 of 1,008,729 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?