Egological Investigations

Dissertation, University of Miami (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this dissertation is to examine--in a phenomenological context--some of the problems connected with apperception, the self, or the subject of consciousness, and the notion of self-identity closely related to these. This is accomplished by examining and analyzing the views of Edmund Husserl on this topic. Although the focus of attention is on Husserl's views on this topic, some Kantian themes concerning the topic are also given serious consideration. ;The issues considered include the senses in which the Ego, or self, is and is not excluded by the phenomenological reduction and how these senses are predetermined by the phenomenology of apperception. The most salient feature of the dissertation, however, is the clarification and analysis of the relationships obtaining among apperception, the phenomenology of internal time-consciousness, and the various senses in which the Ego may be posited in the phenomenological realm. Specifically, careful attention is focused on to what extent the phenomenology of apperception and internal time-consciousness can establish a self-identical, abiding, and 'enduring' Ego--i.e., one enduring through past, present, and future acts of consciousness as "the self-same 'I'." Accordingly, the role of memory in integrating an 'enduring' self is carefully examined. Most importantly, the role of the varying conceptions of time in deciding difficult questions in the phenomenology of apperception is carefully considered. For instance: The importance of temporal considerations in positing an enduring or permanent subject of consciousness apart from the ever-present phenomenological Here and Now. Indeed, whether and to what extent the transcendental reification of an enduring self-identical Ego can be effected seems to be totally determined by the prevailing temporal conceptualizations. In what manner the phenomenological subject of consciousness does and does not satisfy the criteria for the Kantian transcendental unity of apperception due to the crucial role of the prevailing temporal conceptualizations in differentiating the immanent phenomenological Ego from the Kantian transcendental unity of pure apperception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Between Wolff and Kant: Merian's theory of apperception.Udo Thiel - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):213-232.
Kant's Theory of Self-Knowledge.Quanhua Liu - 1994 - Dissertation, Duke University
Philosophical Issues: Phenomenology.Evan Thompson & Dan Zahavi - 2007 - In Morris Moscovitch, Philip Zelazo & Evan Thompson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 67-87.
Non-Apperceptive Consciousness.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - In Riccardo Pozzo, Piero Giordanetti & Marco Sgarbi (eds.), Kant's Philosophy of the Unconscious. de Gruyter.
Unconscious consciousness in Husserl and Freud.Rudolf Bernet - 2002 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):327-351.
Kant's thinker.Patricia Kitcher - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references