Romantic longings, moral ideals, and democratic priorities: On Richard Rorty's use of the distinction between the private and the public
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120 (2007)
The heart of Richard Rorty's philosophy is his distinction between the private and the public. In the first part of this paper, I highlight the profound influence that the inherited vocabularies of Romanticism and Moralism have had on Rorty's understanding of both the distinction and the problems he intends to solve with it. I also suggest that Rorty shares with Plato, Kant, and Nietzsche philosophical habits that cause him to treat two importantly different problems as one. Once the moral problem is disentangled from the political, it becomes clear that Rorty's distinction is unnecessary to the former and inadequate for the latter. In the second part of the paper, I argue that Rorty's non-foundationalist pragmatism supports the view that the political problem is best resolved by what I call a democratic mechanism of arbitration. It is the lingering influence of Romanticism and Moralism, I suggest, that is the cause of Rorty's reluctance to embrace fully the political priority of democratic consensus. Finally, I discuss why this analysis of Rorty's liberalism may have implications for the general question of how best to resolve political disputes in pluralist societies.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Serge Grigoriev (2011). Rorty, Religion, and Humanism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):187-201.
Paul D. Forster (2000). Problems with Rorty's Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Susan Dieleman (2010). Revisiting Rorty: Contributions to a Pragmatist Feminism. Hypatia 25 (4):891-908.
Hartmut von Sass (2011). Religion in a Private Igloo? A Critical Dialogue with Richard Rorty. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):203-216.
John T. Lysaker (1996). The Shape of Selves to Come: Rorty and Self-Creation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):39-74.
Brad Frazier (2006). The Ethics of Rortian Redescription. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):461-492.
Richard Rorty (2006). Take Care of Freedom and Truth Will Take Care of Itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Stanford University Press.
Chad Kautzer (2003). Rorty's Country, Rorty's Empire. Radical Philosophy Review 6 (2):131-144.
David Rondel (2009). Liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
Rachel Haliburton (1997). Richard Rorty and the Problem of Cruelty. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):49-69.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #281,030 of 1,932,483 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,120 of 1,932,483 )
How can I increase my downloads?