The Effect of Prosody on Conceptual Combination
Cognitive Science 34 (6):1107-1123 (2010)
| Abstract | Research into people’s comprehension of novel noun-noun phrases has long neglected the possible influences of prosody during meaning construction. At the same time, work in conceptual combination has disagreed about whether different classes of interpretation emerge from single or multiple processes; for example, whether people use distinct mechanisms when they interpret octopus apartment as property-based (e.g., an apartment with eight rooms) or relation-based (e.g., an apartment where an octopus lives). In two studies, we manipulate the prosodic emphasis patterns of novel noun-noun combinations (placing stress on the modifier noun, the head noun, or dual stress on both nouns) and ask participants to generate an interpretation for the novel phrase. Results show that people are faster to generate property-based interpretations when dual emphasis stresses both nouns equally, with prosody having little effect on the speed of relation-based interpretations. These findings highlight a role for prosody during meaning construction and underline important differences between relation- and property-based interpretations that are difficult to reconcile with unitary process views of conceptual combination | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobbins Burling (2004). Prosody Does Not Equal Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):509-509.
Louise Connell & Dermot Lynott (2011). Modality Switching Costs Emerge in Concept Creation as Well as Retrieval. Cognitive Science 35 (4):763-778.
W. Beare (1938). The Prosody of Terence W. A. Laidlaw: The Prosody of Terence. A Relational Study. Pp. Vii + 138. (St. Andrews University Publications, No. XL.) London: Milford, 1938. Boards, 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (06):224-225.
Raymond Turner (1985). Three Theories of Nominalized Predicates. Studia Logica 44 (2):165 - 186.
Marilee Monnot, Robert Foley & Elliott Ross (2004). Affective Prosody: Whence Motherese. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):518-519.
Peter Lasersohn (1989). On the Readings of Plural Noun Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 20 (1):130-134.
Henry Laycock (2005). 'Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns'. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.
Paul R. Thagard (1997). Coherent and Creative Conceptual Combinations. In T.B. Ward, S.M Smith & J. Viad (eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. American Psychological Association.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-16Total downloads3 ( #203,804 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
