David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford University Press (2005)
Before imagination became the transcendent and creative faculty promoted by the Romantics, it was for something quite different. Not reserved to a privileged few, imagination was instead considered a universal ability that each person could direct in practical ways. To imagine something meant to form in the mind a replica of a thing—its taste, its sound, and other physical attributes. At the end of the Renaissance, there was a movement to encourage individuals to develop their ability to imagine vividly. Within their private mental space, a space of embodied, sensual thought, they could meditate, pray, or philosophize. Gradually, confidence in the self-directed imagination fell out of favor and was replaced by the belief that the few—an elite of writers and teachers—should control the imagination of the many. This book seeks to understand what imagination meant in early modern Europe, particularly in early modern France, before the Romantic era gave the term its modern meaning. The author explores the themes surrounding early modern notions of imagination (including hostility to imagination) through the writings of such figures as Descartes, Montaigne, François de Sales, Pascal, the Marquise de Se;vigne;, Madame de Lafayette, and Fe;nelon.
|Keywords||French literature History and criticism French literature History and criticism French literature History and criticism Imagination in literature Philosophy, French Philosophy, French Philosophy, French Imagination (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$45.60 used (21% off) $57.50 direct from Amazon $57.50 new Amazon page|
|Call number||PQ145.1.I45.L96 2005|
|ISBN(s)||0804751102 9780804751100 0804767572 9780804767576|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gary Hatfield (1986). The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises. In Amelie Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes' Meditations. University of California Press 45–76.
Citations of this work BETA
William D. Wood (2009). Axiology, Self-Deception, and Moral Wrongdoing in Blaise Pascal's Pensées. Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):355-384.
Similar books and articles
Jefferson Humphries (1987). The Puritan and the Cynic: Moralists and Theorists in French and American Letters. Oxford University Press.
Everett W. Knight (1957). Literature Considered as Philosophy: The French Example. London, Routledge & Paul.
Ian W. Alexander (1985). French Literature and the Philosophy of Consciousness: Phenomenological Essays. St. Martin's Press.
Paul Cooke & Helen Vassallo (eds.) (2009). Alienation and Alterity: Otherness in Modern and Contemporary Francophone Contexts. Peter Lang.
Leonora Cohen Rosenfield (1940). From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine. New York, Octagon Books.
Scott M. Powers (ed.) (2011). Evil in Contemporary French and Francophone Literature. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
John Culbert (2010). Paralyses: Literature, Travel, and Ethnography in French Modernity. University of Nebraska Press.
George Boas (1933). The Happy Beast in French Thought of the Seventeenth Century. New York, Octagon Books.
Michelle Karnes (2011). Imagination, Meditation, and Cognition in the Middle Ages. The University of Chicago Press.
Christie McDonald & Susan Rubin Suleiman (eds.) (2010). French Global: A New Approach to Literary History. Columbia University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #139,870 of 1,902,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #329,673 of 1,902,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?