Is Hare's prescriptivism morally neutral?
Ethics 82 (3):259-261 (1972)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJames W. McGray (1986). From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophy Research Archives 12:79-86.
Vincent C. Punzo (1980). The Normative Function of Reason as Reflectivity: An Alternative to Hare's Prescriptivism. The Review of Metaphysics 33 (3):593 - 613.
H. J. McCloskey (1979). Universalized Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism: Hare's Attempted Forced Marriage. Journal of Value Inquiry 13 (1):63-76.
Gerard J. Hughes & J. S. (1973). Prescriptivism in Theory and in Practice: The Moral Philosophy of R. M. Hare. Heythrop Journal 14 (2):136–146.
Keith Dowling (1992). Hare's Route From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophical Papers 21 (1):65-81.
Ingmar Persson (1983). Hare on Universal Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism. Analysis 43 (1):43 - 49.
Geoffrey Madell (1965). Hare's Prescriptivism. Analysis 26 (2):37 - 41.
C. D. MacNiven (1964). Hare's Universal Prescriptivism. Dialogue 3 (02):191-198.
Anthony Skelton (2001). Review of R. M. Hare Sorting Out Ethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):583 – 585.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
