David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1971)
David Lyons is one of the preeminent philosophers of law active in the United States. This volume comprises essays written over a period of twenty years in which Professor Lyons outlines his fundamental views about the nature of law and its relation to morality and justice. The underlying theme of the book is that a system of law has only a tenuous connection with morality and justice. Contrary to those legal theorists who maintain that no matter how bad the law of a community might be, strict conformity to existing law automatically dispenses "formal" justice, Professor Lyons contends that the law must earn the respect that it demands. Moreover, we cannot, as some would suggest, interpret law in a value-neutral manner. Rather courts should interpret statutes, judicial precedents, and constitutional provisions in terms of values that would justify those laws. In this way officials can promote the justifiability of what they do to people in the name of law, and can help the law live up to its moral pretensions.
|Keywords||Law and ethics Justice Justice, Administration of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$9.00 used (87% off) $45.28 new (31% off) $64.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ55.L954 1993|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
J. S. Russell (1997). The Concept of a Call in Baseball. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 24 (1):21-37.
Eveline T. Feteris (2005). The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.
Eveline T. Feteris (2008). The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing and Balancing on the Basis of Teleological-Evaluative Considerations in the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Ratio Juris 21 (4):481-495.
Anthony Reeves (2011). Judicial Practical Reason: Judges in Morally Imperfect Legal Orders. Law and Philosophy 30 (3):319-352.
Eveline T. Feteris (2008). The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.
Similar books and articles
Neil MacCormick (2007). Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Roscoe Pound (1951). Justice According to Law. Port Washington, N.Y.,Kennikat Press.
Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas & Martha Merrill Umphrey (eds.) (2005). The Limits of Law. Stanford University Press.
Alan W. Norrie (2005). Law and the Beautiful Soul. Published in the United States by Cavendish Pub..
C. L. ten (1994). David Lyons, Moral Aspects of Legal Theory: Essays on Law, Justice, and Political Responsibility, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, Pp. 217. Utilitas 6 (2):313.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Garrett Barden (2010). Law and Justice in Community. Oxford University Press.
Samuel Freeman (1994). Book Review:Moral Aspects of Legal Theory: Essays on Law, Justice, and Political Responsibility. David Lyons. [REVIEW] Ethics 105 (1):191-.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #108,570 of 1,911,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #180,081 of 1,911,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?