Curve it, gauge it, or leave it? Practical underdetermination in gravitational theories

Abstract
Four empirically equivalent versions of general relativity, namely standard GR, Lorentz-invariant gravitational theory,and the gravitational gauge theories of the Lorentz and translation groups, are investigated in the form of a case study for theory underdetermination. The various ontological indeterminacies (both underdetermination and inscrutability of reference) inherent in gravitational theories are analyzed in a detailed comparative study. The concept of practical underdetermination is proposed, followed by a discussion of its adequacy to describe scientific progress.
Keywords gauge theories of gravity  fiber bundles  ontologicalunderdetermination
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,456
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Eleanor Knox (2011). Newton–Cartan Theory and Teleparallel Gravity: The Force of a Formulation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 42 (4):264-275.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

17 ( #99,625 of 1,102,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #37,092 of 1,102,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.