David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):667-681 (2011)
Gender discrimination continues to be a problem in organizations. It is therefore important that organizations use performance evaluation methods that ensure equal opportunities for men and women. This article reports the results of an experiment to investigate whether and, if so, how the gender of the rater and that of the ratee moderate the relationship between the level of subjectivity in performance appraisals and organizational attractiveness. Participants in the experiment were 313 undergraduate students. We predicted, and indeed established, that as the probability increases that employee performance is evaluated by a female manager, women expect more positive outcomes of subjective, but not objective evaluation processes. Our data did not support our expectation that as the probability of being evaluated by a female manager increases, men expect less positive outcomes of subjective evaluation processes. The findings of this study contribute to our understanding of why women are over-represented in jobs with objective formula-based reward systems, such as piece-rate systems. They are also of interest to organizations that are looking for more ethical human resource management practices
|Keywords||performance appraisal subjectivity gender sex bias|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerald R. Ferris & Thomas R. King (1992). The Politics of Age Discrimination in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):341-350.
Kevin Campbell & Antonio Mínguez-Vera (2008). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):435 - 451.
Sevki Ozgener (2008). Diversity Management and Demographic Differences-Based Discrimination: The Case of Turkish Manufacturing Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):621 - 631.
Cláudia Sarrico, Maria Rosa, Pedro Teixeira & Margarida Cardoso (2010). Assessing Quality and Evaluating Performance in Higher Education: Worlds Apart or Complementary Views? Minerva 48 (1):35-54.
Gertrude Postl (2009). From Gender as Performative to Feminist Performance Art. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):87-103.
Nikala Lane & Nigel F. Piercy (2003). The Ethics of Discrimination: Organizational Mindsets and Female Employment Disadvantage. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):313 - 325.
Robin Fretwell Wilson, Martha Neff-Smith, Donald Phillips & John C. Fletcher (1993). HECs: Are They Evaluating Their Performance? [REVIEW] HEC Forum 5 (1):1-34.
Val Singh, Savita Kumra & Susan Vinnicombe (2002). Gender and Impression Management: Playing the Promotion Game. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):77 - 89.
Brooke A. Ackerly (2009). Feminist Theory, Global Gender Justice, and the Evaluation of Grant Making. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):179-198.
Bill Shaw (1988). Affirmative Action: An Ethical Evaluation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):763 - 770.
Hang-Yue Ngo, Sharon Foley, Angela Wong & Raymond Loi (2003). Who Gets More of the Pie? Predictors of Perceived Gender Inequity at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):227 - 241.
A. Catherine McCabe, Rhea Ingram & Mary Conway Dato-on (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):101 - 116.
Nancy B. Kurland (2001). The Impact of Legal Age Discrimination on Women in Professional Occupations. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2):331-348.
Myrtle P. Bell, Mary E. Mclaughlin & Jennifer M. Sequeira (2002). Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives as Change Agents. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):65 - 76.
Marla Morton-Brown (2004). Artificial Ef-Femination. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):27-34.
Added to index2011-07-25
Total downloads10 ( #118,509 of 1,013,238 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,013,238 )
How can I increase my downloads?