Does Shafer-Landau have a problem with supervenience?
Philosophical Studies 126 (2):297 - 311 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael Ridge (2004). Moral Realism: A Defence. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):540 – 544.
Christian Miller (2006). Shafer-Landau and Moral Realism. Social Theory and Practice 32 (2):311-331.
Russ Shafer-Landau (2007). The Good in the Right by Robert Audi. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):250-261.
Mark Schroeder (2012). Reply to Shafer-Landau, Mcpherson, and Dancy. Philosophical Studies 157 (3):463-474.
Mark van Roojen (2005). Rationalist Realism and Constructivist Accounts of Morality. Philosophical Studies 126 (2):285-295.
Russ Shafer-Landau (2003/2005). Moral Realism: A Defence. Oxford University Press.
Jeff Wisdom (2008). Base Property Exemplification and Mixed Worlds: Remarks on the Shafer-Landau/Mabrito Exchange. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):429-434.
Russ Shafer-Landau (1994). Supervenience and Moral Realism. Ratio 7 (2):145-152.
Michael Ridge (2007). Anti-Reductionism and Supervenience. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):330-348.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #39,385 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
