Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 13 (8):615 - 623 (1994)
|Abstract||Current discussions of business ethics usually only consider deontological and utilitarian approaches. What is missing is a discussion of traditional teleology, often referred to as virtue ethics. While deontology and teleology are useful, they both suffer insufficiencies. Traditional teleology, while deontological in many respects, does not object to utilitarian style calculations as long as they are contained within a moral framework that is not utilitarian in its origin. It contains the best of both approaches and can be used to focus on the individual''s role within an organization. More work is needed in exposing students and faculty to traditional teleology and its place in business ethic''s discussions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Andrew Woodfield (1976). Teleology. Cambridge University Press.
Mohan Matthen (1991). Naturalism and Teleology. Journal of Philosophy 88 (11):656-657.
F. J. K. Soontiëns (1991). Evolution: Teleology or Chance? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (1):133-141.
Willem A. deVries (1991). The Dialectic of Teleology. Philosophical Topics 19 (2):51-70.
William J. Ellos (1984). The Practice of Medical Ethics: A Structuralistic Approach. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
Jeffrey Wattles (2006). Teleology Past and Present. Zygon 41 (2):445-464.
Todd A. Salzman (1995). Deontology and Teleology: An Investigation of the Normative Debate in Roman Catholic Moral Theology. Uitgeverij Peeters.
Miriam Ronzoni (2010). Teleology, Deontology, and the Priority of the Right: On Some Unappreciated Distinctions. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):453 - 472.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #18,785 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?