David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Judgment: IWM JVF Conference Vol. 21 (2006)
My concern in this paper is how to reconcile a central tension in Hannah Arendt’s thinking, one that – if left unresolved – may make us reluctant to endorse her political theory. Arendt was profoundly and painfully aware of the horrors of political evil; in fact, she is almost unparalleled in 20 th century thought in her concern for the consequences of mass political violence, the victims of political atrocities, and the most vulnerable in political society – the stateless, the pariahs, the outcasts. At least, this is the case in her discussions of concrete, historical political situations. Yet in her philosophical writings, she continues to argue that the political realm ultimately redeems human existence, and furthermore, that politics should remain distinct and autonomous from moral evaluation. Political action must be evaluated according to “greatness,” not goodness or any other explicitly moral or even ethical standard. She goes so far as to suggest that politics and morality may be deeply hostile to one another, and can only be reconciled in situations of extreme emergency. This can leave many feeling both perplexed and deeply uncomfortable with the theory of human action that Arendt proposes. Drawing on her notions of political conscience, judgment and - in particular - her account of forgiveness, in this paper I argue that Arendt offers an ethics of plurality, in which what is good is developed from what is most politically important: amor mundi, or love of our shared political world.
|Keywords||Hannah Arendt Forgiveness Political Forgiveness Political Judgment Political Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roger Berkowitz (ed.) (2010). Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press.
Phillip Birger Hansen (1993). Hannah Arendt: Politics, History and Citizenship. Stanford University Press.
Garrath Williams (2007). Ethics and Human Relationality: Between Arendt's Accounts of Morality. HannahArendt.Net 3.
Linda M. G. Zerilli (2005). "We Feel Our Freedom": Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Political Theory 33 (2):158 - 188.
Irving Louis Horowitz (2012). Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative. Transaction Publishers.
Patricia Owens (2009). Between War and Politics: International Relations and the Thought of Hannah Arendt. OUP Oxford.
Hannah Arendt (2000). The Portable Hannah Arendt. Penguin Books.
Garrath Williams (1998). Love and Responsibility: A Political Ethic for Hannah Arendt. Political Studies 46 (5):937-950.
Alice MacLachlan (2012). The Philosophical Controversy Over Political Forgiveness. In Paul van Tongeren, Neelke Doorn & Bas van Stokkom (eds.), Public Forgiveness in Post-Conflict Contexts. Intersentia. 37-64.
Keith Breen (2007). Violence and Power: A Critique of Hannah Arendt on the `Political'. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (3):343-372.
Dana Richard Villa (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
Majid Yar (2000). From Actor to Spectator: Hannah Arendt's 'Two Theories' of Political Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):1-27.
Michael Halberstam (2001). Aestheticism, or Aesthetic Approach, in Arendt and Heidegger on Politics. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:219-232.
Lucy Tatman (2013). Arendt and Augustine: More Than One Kind of Love. Sophia 52 (4):625-635.
Added to index2010-09-21
Total downloads54 ( #28,665 of 1,098,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #22,304 of 1,098,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?