Argumentative Persuasiveness in Ancient Pyrrhonism

Méthexis 22:101-26 (2009)
The present paper has two, interrelated objectives. The first is to analyze the different senses in which arguments are characterized as persuasive in the extant writings of Sextus Empiricus. The second is to examine the Pyrrhonist’s therapeutic use of arguments in the discussion with his Dogmatic rivals – more precisely, to determine the sense and basis of Sextus’ distinction between therapeutic arguments that appear weighty and therapeutic arguments that appear weak in their persuasiveness.
Keywords Pyrrhonism  Persuasiveness  Argumentation
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Diego E. Machuca, Argumentative Persuasiveness in Ancient Pyrrhonism
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Diego E. Machuca (2008). Sextus Empiricus: His Outlook, Works, and Legacy. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 55 (1/2):28-63.
Dan Moller (2010). The Pyrrhonian Skeptic's Telos. Ancient Philosophy 24 (2):425 - 441.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

254 ( #4,980 of 1,726,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

75 ( #17,619 of 1,726,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.