Animalism versus lockeanism: No contest

Philosophical Quarterly 50 (196):369-376 (1999)
Abstract
In ‘Animalism versus Lockeanism: a Current Controversy’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 48 (1998), pp. 302–18, Harold Noonan examined the relation between animalist and neo‐Lockean theories of personal identity. As well as presenting arguments intended to support a modest compatibilism of animalism and neo‐Lockeanism, he advanced a new proposal about the relation between persons and human beings which was intended to evade the principal animalist objections to neo‐Lockean theories. I argue both that the arguments for compatibilism are without force, and that Noonan’s new neo‐Lockean proposal is inadequate
Keywords Animalism  Epistemology  Locke  Noonan, H
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9213.00148
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,700
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Andrew M. Bailey (2015). Animalism. Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

116 ( #31,003 of 1,790,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #141,142 of 1,790,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.