David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2014)
John MacFarlane explores how we might make sense of the idea that truth is relative. He provides new, satisfying accounts of parts of our thought and talk that have resisted traditional methods of analysis, including what we mean when we talk about what is tasty, what we know, what will happen, what might be the case, and what we ought to do.
|Keywords||relative truth assessment sensitivity context sensitivity relativism truth|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$39.48 new (29% off) $44.12 used (20% off) $55.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Teresa Marques (2015). Retractions. Synthese:1-25.
John Eriksson & Marco Tiozzo (2016). Matters of Ambiguity: Faultless Disagreement, Relativism and Realism. Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1517-1536.
Mikkel Gerken (2015). How to Do Things with Knowledge Ascriptions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (1):223-234.
John MacFarlane (2016). Replies to Raffman, Stanley, and Wright. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (1):197-202.
Similar books and articles
Eric James Morelli (2011). Insight and the Subject. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):137-148.
Frederick E. Crowe (2003). The Puzzle of the Subject as Subject in Lonergan. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205.
John MacFarlane (2007). Relativism and Disagreement. Philosophical Studies 132 (1):17-31.
KJ Gilhooly & P. Murphy (2005). Differentiating Insight From Non-Insight Problems. Thinking and Reasoning 11 (3):279 – 302.
Stephen J. Barker (2010). Cognitive Expressivism, Faultless Disagreement, and Absolute but Non-Objective Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (2pt2):183-199.
Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes (2012). Varieties of Disagreement and Predicates of Taste. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):167 - 181.
Alexander Almér (2009). Contextualism, Assessor Relativism, and Insensitive Assessments. Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):363.
Jonathan Schaffer (2009). Perspective in Taste Predicates and Epistemic Modals. In Andy Egan & B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press
Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder (2013). Reversibility or Disagreement. Mind 122 (485):43-84.
Added to index2009-08-03
Total downloads88 ( #45,848 of 1,793,280 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #89,724 of 1,793,280 )
How can I increase my downloads?