David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):275-288 (2005)
In Warranted Christian Beliet Alvin Plantinga claims that “The Enlightenment looked askance at testimony and tradition; Locke saw them as a preeminent source of error.” Locke, Plantinga suggests, is the “fountainhead” of this stance. This is importantly wrong about Locke and Locke”s views, and an examination of the views of Locke’s much admired friend and slightly older contemporary, Robert Boyle, reveals that the claim is mistaken about him as well, reinforcing the view that Plantinga is in general mistaken about the intellectual milieu in which Locke wrote. In this paper I consider the views of Locke and Boyle on demonstration, observation, experiment, and testimony with a view to showing what, in the case of science and religion, their views actually were. For Locke I draw mainly on the Essay, while for Boyle I draw heavily on the MSS in the Royal Society Library, as well as on the printed works
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lisa McNulty (2013). Lockean Social Epistemology. Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (4):524-536.
Similar books and articles
Jan-Erik Jones (2005). Boyle, Classification and the Workmanship of the Understanding Thesis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Jan-Erik Jones (2007). Locke Vs. Boyle: The Real Essence of Corpuscular Species. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):659 – 684.
Peter Alexander (1985). Ideas, Qualities, and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World. Cambridge University Press.
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
David Palmer (1976). Boyle's Corpuscular Hypothesis and Locke's Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction. Philosophical Studies 29 (3):181 - 189.
M. Ben-Chaim (2000). Locke's Ideology of 'Common Sense'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):473-501.
Lisa Downing (2001). The Uses of Mechanism: Corpuscularianism in Drafts a and B of Locke's Essay. In William Newman, John Murdoch & Cristoph Lüthy (eds.), Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscularian Matter Theory. E.J. Brill 515-534.
Joseph Shieber (2009). Locke on Testimony: A Reexamination. History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (1):21 - 41.
Robert A. Wilson (2016). Primary and Secondary Qualities. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), A Companion to Locke. Blackwell 193-211.
Keith Allen (2010). Locke and the Nature of Ideas. Archiv fur Geschishte der Philosophie 92 (3):236-255.
Graham Faiella (2006). John Locke: Champion of Modern Democracy. Rosen Pub. Group.
Timothy Stanton (2011). Christian Foundations; or Some Loose Stones? Toleration and the Philosophy of Locke's Politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):323-347.
Lisa Downing (2007). Locke's Ontology. In Lex Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke's. Cambridge University Press
Laura Keating (1993). Un-Locke-Ing Boyle: Boyle on Primary and Secondary Qualities. History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (4):305 - 323.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads33 ( #143,418 of 1,941,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #225,914 of 1,941,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?