David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (6):669-689 (2011)
When Adorno refers to the concept of maturity (Mündigkeit), he generally means having the courage and the ability to use one’s own understanding independently of dominant heteronomous patterns of thought. This Kantian-sounding claim is essentially an exhortation: maturity demands self-liberation from heteronomy, i.e. autonomy. The problem, however, is that in spite of Adorno’s general endorsement of Kant’s definition of maturity, he ultimately rejects the corresponding Kantian definition of autonomy. Yet Adorno does not simply discard the Kantian concept of autonomy. On the contrary, he will try to correct it by returning to it what it lacks, namely, intimacy or ‘live contact with the warmth of things’. In this gesture, he aims to restore to autonomy its ethical substance or lived ethical context, not as a mere supplement to the purity of duty, but rather as necessary to the very process of becoming mature. This article examines Adorno’s concept of maturity in the context of the dialectical relationship between autonomy and intimacy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. W. Skees (2011). Kant, Adorno and the Work of Art. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Deborah Cook (2007). Nature, Red in Tooth and Claw. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):49-72.
Karen S. Feldman (2011). Not Dialectical Enough: On Benjamin, Adorno, and Autonomous Critique. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (4):336-362.
Barbara Secker (1999). The Appearance of Kant's Deontology in Contemporary Kantianism: Concepts of Patient Autonomy in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):43 – 66.
Espen Hammer (2000). Minding the World: Adorno's Critique of Idealism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (1):71-92.
Patricia C. Flynn (2007). Honesty and Intimacy in Kant's Duty of Friendship. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
David Owen (1994). Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault, and the Ambivalence of Reason. Routledge.
R. S. M. Patricia C. Flynn (2007). Honesty and Intimacy in Kant's Duty of Friendship. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424.
Christian F. Rostbøll (2011). Kantian Autonomy and Political Liberalism. Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):341-364.
Espen Hammer (2000). Adorno and Extreme Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Bed P. Paudyal (2009). Mimesis in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.
Eric L. Krakauer (1998). Prescriptions: Autonomy, Humanism and the Purpose of Health Technology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6):525-545.
Gerald Dworkin (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Babette Babich (2011). Adorno on Nihilism and Modern Science, Animals, and Jews. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (1):110-145.
Added to index2011-04-27
Total downloads17 ( #103,238 of 1,102,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,049 of 1,102,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?