David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):181 - 189 (2007)
This paper considers whether individual companies have an ethical obligation to label their Genetically Modified (GM) foods. GM foods and ingredients pervade grocery store shelves, despite the fact that a majority of North Americans have worries about eating those products. The market as whole has largely failed to respond to consumer preference in this regard, as have North American governments. A number of consumer groups, NGO’s, and activist organizations have urged corporations to label their GM products. This paper asks whether, in such a situation, individual corporations can be ethically required to take such unilateral action. We argue that they cannot. Given the lack of solid evidence for any risk to human health, and the serious market disadvantage almost surely associated with costly unilateral action, no individual company has an ethical obligation to label its GM foods.
|Keywords||Genetically Modified foods labelling self-regulation voluntary corporate social responsibility technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri (2009). Csr Practices and Corporate Strategy: Evidence From a Longitudinal Case Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):153 - 168.
Helena Siipi & Susanne Uusitalo (2011). Consumer Autonomy and Availability of Genetically Modified Food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):147-163.
Salla Laasonen, Martin Fougère & Arno Kourula (2012). Dominant Articulations in Academic Business and Society Discourse on NGO–Business Relations: A Critical Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):521-545.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.) (2008). What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Kirsten Hansen (2004). Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Doris Schroeder (2007). Public Health, Ethics, and Functional Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):247-259.
Assya Pascalev (2003). You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594.
Alison Bailey, Jan M. Boxill, Emmett L. Bradbury, Maudemarie Clark, Samir J. Haddad & Colin M. Patrick (2003). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (4):923-928.
Celina Ramjoué (2007). The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Miltos Ladikas & Doris Schroeder (2005). Argumentation Theory and GM Foods. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (3):216-225.
Margaret McLean (2001). Genetically Modified Foods. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 20 (3/4):79-104.
Alan Rubel & Robert Streiffer (2005). Respecting the Autonomy of European and American Consumers: Defending Positive Labels on Gm Foods. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):75-84.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #78,660 of 1,099,912 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,387 of 1,099,912 )
How can I increase my downloads?