Can structuralism solve the ‘access’ problem?
Analysis 64 (284):309–317 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJulian C. Cole (2010). Mathematical Structuralism Today. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):689-699.
Jukka Keränen (2001). The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):308--30.
Justin P. McBrayer (2007). Process Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, and the Value of Knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):289-302.
Jonathan B. King (1993). Learning to Solve the Right Problems: The Case of Nuclear Power in America. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (2):105 - 116.
John Forge (2002). Reflections on Structuralism and Scientific Explanation. Synthese 130 (1):109 - 121.
Ken Akiba (2000). Indefiniteness of Mathematical Objects. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):26--46.
Mike Fuller (1996). Puppets and Pebbles and Ripples and Strings: Structuralism and Post-Structuralism Contrasted. Cogito 10 (1):49-55.
Russell Marcus (2007). Structuralism, Indispensability, and the Access Problem. Facta Philosophica 9 (1):203-211.
Stewart Shapiro (2011). Epistemology of Mathematics: What Are the Questions? What Count as Answers? Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):130-150.
Fraser MacBride (2008). Can Ante Rem Structuralism Solve the Access Problem? Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):155-164.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #39,358 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
