Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):289-311 (1996)
|Abstract||: The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments experienced some disagreements among its members in the course of its work. An epistemological controversy over the nature and degree of evidence required to draw ethical conclusions pervaded the committee's deliberations. Other disagreements involved the proper role of a governmental advisory committee and the question of when it is appropriate to notify people that they were unknowing subjects of radiation experiments. In the end, the Committee was able to reach consensus on almost all of its findings and recommendations through a process that preserved the integrity of its members|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. M. Martinez (2012). Managing Scientific Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making: The Case of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):6-27.
Matthias Kaiser & Ellen-Marie Forsberg (2002). Consensus Conference on Environmental Values in Radiation Protection: A Report on Building Consensus Among Experts. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):593-602.
Charles Weijer, The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
Jonathan D. Moreno & Susan E. Lederer (1996). Revising the History of Cold War Research Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3).
Don Fawkes (2006). Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
Ruth R. Faden (1996). Chair's Perspective on the Work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):215-221.
Tom L. Beauchamp (1996). Looking Back and Judging Our Predecessors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):251-270.
Jonathan D. Moreno (1988). Ethics by Committee: The Moral Authority of Consensus. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):411-432.
Nancy E. Kass & Jeremy Sugarman (1996). Are Research Subjects Adequately Protected? A Review and Discussion of Studies Conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3).
Allen E. Buchanan (1996). The Controversy Over Retrospective Moral Judgment. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):245-250.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,151 of 549,118 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,118 )
How can I increase my downloads?