Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):56-84 (2004)
|Abstract||: Although there are important aspects of ecofeminist valuations of women's caring, a greater degree of skepticism than is now found in ecofeminist scholarship is in order. In this article I argue that there are political risks in celebrating women's association with caring, as both an ethic and a practice, and in reducing women's ethico-political life to care. I support this position by drawing on the work of feminist theorists who argue that the positive identification of women with caring ought to be treated cautiously for it obscures some of the negative implications of feminized care and narrows our understanding of women as political actors. I explain why I think ecofeminists would be better served by using feminist theories of citizenship to understand and interpret women's engagement in politics|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Engster (2005). Rethinking Care Theory: The Practice of Caring and the Obligation to Care. Hypatia 20 (3):50-74.
Michalinos Zembylas (2010). The Ethic of Care in Globalized Societies: Implications for Citizenship Education. Ethics and Education 5 (3):233 - 245.
Holloway Sparks (1997). Dissident Citizenship: Democratic Theory, Political Courage, and Activist Women. Hypatia 12 (4):74 - 110.
Katharine Lawrence Balfour (2005). Representative Women: Slavery, Citizenship, and Feminist Theory in du Bois's "Damnation of Women". Hypatia 20 (3):127-148.
Katherine Pettus (1997). Ecofeminist Citizenship. Hypatia 12 (4):132-155.
Fiona Robinson (2011). The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Temple University Press.
Helga Kuhse, Peter Singer & Maurice Rickard (1998). Reconciling Impartial Morality and a Feminist Ethic of Care. Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (4):451-463.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #44,013 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,729 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?