Feature learning, multiresolution analysis, and symbol grounding
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):32-33 (1998)
| Abstract | Cognitive theories based on a fixed feature set suffer from frame and symbol grounding problems. Flexible features and other empirically acquired constraints (e.g., analog-to-analog mappings) provide a framework for letting extrinsic relations influence symbol manipulation. By offering a biologically plausible basis for feature learning, nonorthogonal multiresolution analysis and dimensionality reduction, informed by functional constraints, may contribute to a solution to the symbol grounding problem. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. Franklin Boyle (2001). Transduction and Degree of Grounding. Psycoloquy 12 (36).
Stevan Harnad (1995). Grounding Symbols in Sensorimotor Categories with Neural Networks. Institute of Electrical Engineers Colloquium on "Grounding Representations.
Dairon Rodríguez, Jorge Hermosillo & Bruno Lara (2012). Meaning in Artificial Agents: The Symbol Grounding Problem Revisited. Minds and Machines 22 (1):25-34.
Stevan Harnad, Symbol Grounding is an Empirical Problem: Neural Nets Are Just a Candidate Component.
Vincent C. Müller (2009). Symbol Grounding in Computational Systems: A Paradox of Intentions. Minds and Machines 19 (4):529-541.
John E. Hummel (2010). Symbolic Versus Associative Learning. Cognitive Science 34 (6):958-965.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
