Philosophical Explorations 2 (3):206-224 (1999)
|Abstract||There is a 'philosophers' assumption that there is a problem with the very notion of an unconscious mental state.The paper begins by outlining how the problem is generated, and proceeds to argue that certain conditions need to be fulfilled if the unconscious is to qualify as mental. An explanation is required as to why we would ever expect these conditions to be fulfilled, and it is suggested that the Freudian concept of repression has an essential role to play in such an explanation. Notoriously this concept brings with it a further puzzle: it looks as though repression serves a purpose, and so requires an agent to execute this purpose, a repressor. Paradox is avoided only if repression is viewed in biologicalfunctional terms.The result is that the notion of the unconscious is saved from the a priori objections often levelled at it by philosophers.This still leaves considerable theoretical work to be done by psychological science|
|Keywords||Folk Psychology Psychopathology Science Unconsciousness|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Graham (1987). The Origins of Folk Psychology. Inquiry 30 (December):357-79.
Elisa Galgut (2005). Wishful Thinking and the Unconscious: A Reply to Gouws. South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):14-21.
Martin Davies & Tony Stone (1998). Folk Psychology and Mental Simulation. In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frances Egan (1995). Folk Psychology and Cognitive Architecture. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):179-96.
Karsten R. Stueber (2009). The Ethical Dimension of Folk Psychology? Inquiry 52 (5):532-547.
Mark Bevir (2004). The Unconscious in Social Explanation. Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):181-207.
Martin J. Pickering & Nick Chater (1995). Why Cognitive Science is Not Formalized Folk Psychology. Minds and Machines 5 (3):309-337.
Ian Ravenscroft, Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Elizabeth H. Flanagan (2000). Essentialism and a Folk-Taxonomic Approach to the Classification of Psychopathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 7 (3):183-189.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #56,280 of 549,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?