Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):43-56 (1999)
|Abstract||The concept of projection from one space to another, with a consequent loss of information, can be seen in the relationships of gene to protein and language description to real situation. Such a transformation can only be reversed if extra external information is re-supplied. The genetic algorithm embodying this idea is now used in applied mathematics for exploring a configuration space. Such a dialectic – transformation back and forth between two kinds of description – extends the traditional Hegelian concept used by Engels and others of change as resulting from a resolution of the conflict of two opposing tendencies and provides for evolution of the joint system.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adam Henschke (2010). Did You Just Say What I Think You Said? Talking About Genes, Identity and Information. Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):435-456.
Bernard M. Gert (1991). Genetic Disorders and the Ethical Status of Germ-Line Gene Therapy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6).
Ingo Brigandt (2010). The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation. Synthese 177:19-40.
Petter Portin (2002). Historical Development of the Concept of the Gene. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):257 – 286.
Glenn Parsons (2004). Natural Functions and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Inorganic Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):44-56.
Paul E. Griffiths & Karola Stotz (2007). Gene. In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Petter Portin (2009). The Elusive Concept of the Gene. Hereditas 146 (3):112-117.
Paul Griffiths & Russell Gray, The Developmental Systems Perspective: Organism-Environment Systems as Units of Development and Evolution.
Tareq Syed, Michael Bölker & Mathias Gutmann (2008). Genetic “Information” or the Indomitability of a Persisting Scientific Metaphor. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (3-4):193-209.
Nick Zangwill (2005). In Defence of Extreme Formalism About Inorganic Nature: Reply to Parsons. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):185-191.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #201,695 of 548,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?