David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio 11 (2):125-140 (1998)
The view that people go where their brains go remains popular in discussions of personal identity. But since the brain is only a small part of the body, defenders of that view need to provide an account of what it is that makes the brain specially relevant to personal identity. The standard answer is that the brain is special because it is the carrier of psychological continuity. But Peter van Inwagen has recently offered (in Material Beings) an alternative account of the brain' special relevance. Those who reject the view that we go with our brains obviously need to respond to this new account. According to van Inwagen, there is an important difference between the life-support requirements of a severed head and those of a headless body: whereas a severed head would need only a pump to survive, a headless body would need the functional equivalent of a computer in its life-support system. It follows, according to van Inwagen, that we go with our brains. In this paper I argue that van Inwagen's argument is doubly defective: the inference from his premisses to his conclusion is dubious; and in any case his premisses misrepresent the relevant physiological facts.
|Keywords||Epistemology Language Personal Identity Trope Van Inwagen, P|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter van Inwagen (2004). Van Inwagen on Free Will. In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.
Kris McDaniel (2008). Against Composition as Identity. Analysis 68 (298):128–133.
Sydney Shoemaker (1959). Personal Identity and Memory. Journal of Philosophy 56 (October):868-902.
A. Hamilton (1995). A New Look at Personal Identity. Philosophical Quarterly 45 (180):332-349.
George Djukic (2004). Do Four-Dimensionalists Have to Be Counterpart Theorists? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):292 – 311.
Peter Hawke (2011). Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.
Peter Van Inwagen (1997). Materialism and the Psychological-Continuity Account of Personal Identity. Noûs 31:305 - 319.
Peter Van Inwagen (2001). Ontology, Identity, and Modality: Essays in Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Peter van Inwagen (1997). Materialism and the Psychological-Continuity Account of Personal Identity. Philosophical Perspectives 11 (s11):305-319.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #44,495 of 1,096,632 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #17,315 of 1,096,632 )
How can I increase my downloads?