David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):243-262 (2004)
In this paper, we examine critically the notion of “Triple Bottom Line” accounting. We begin by asking just what it is that supporters of the Triple Bottom Line idea advocate, and attempt to distil specific, assessable claims from the vague, diverse, and sometimescontradictory uses of the Triple Bottom Line rhetoric. We then use these claims as a basis upon which to argue (a) that what issound about the idea of a Triple Bottom Line is not novel, and (b) that what is novel about the idea is not sound. We argue on bothconceptual and practical grounds that the Triple Bottom Line is an unhelpful addition to current discussions of corporate social responsibility. Finally, we argue that the Triple Bottom Line paradigm cannot be rescued simply by attenuating its claims: the rhetoric isbadly misleading, and may in fact provide a smokescreen behind which firms can avoid truly effective social and environmental reporting and performance
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Moses L. Pava (2007). A Response to “Getting to the Bottom of 'Triple Bottom Line'”. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):105-110.
Jan Tullberg (2012). Triple Bottom Line – a Vaulting Ambition? Business Ethics 21 (3):310-324.
Wayne Norman (2007). Rescuing the Baby From the Triple-Bottom-Line. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (1):111-114.
Mollie Painter-Morland (2006). Triple Bottom-Line Reporting as Social Grammar: Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Codes of Conduct. Business Ethics 15 (4):352–364.
Markus J. Milne & Rob Gray (2013). W(H)Ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):13-29.
Evonne Miller, Laurie Buys & Jennifer Summerville (2007). Quantifying the Social Dimension of Triple Bottom Line: Development of a Framework and Indicators to Assess the Social Impact of Organisations. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):223-237.
Michael Yeo (1988). Marketing Ethics: The Bottom Line? Journal of Business Ethics 7 (12):929 - 932.
Ronald Jeurissen (2000). John Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (2):229-231.
Kaushik Sridhar (2012). Is the Triple Bottom Line a Restrictive Framework for Non-Financial Reporting? Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):89 - 121.
Kaushik Sridhar & Grant Jones (2013). The Three Fundamental Criticisms of the Triple Bottom Line Approach: An Empirical Study to Link Sustainability Reports in Companies Based in the Asia-Pacific Region and TBL Shortcomings. [REVIEW] Asian Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1):91 - 111.
Pieter Jong, Antony Paulraj & Constantin Blome (2014). The Financial Impact of ISO 14001 Certification: Top-Line, Bottom-Line, or Both? Journal of Business Ethics 119 (1):131-149.
Lisa H. Newton (2000). Millennial Reservations. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):291-303.
Eve Poole (2009). Organisational Spirituality – a Literature Review. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (4):577 - 588.
Lloyd Reinhardt (2005). The Impossible Bottom Line. Analysis 65 (288):341–342.
Yancy Hughes Dominick (2010). Seeing Through Images: The Bottom of Plato's Divided Line. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 1-13.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads26 ( #145,469 of 1,793,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #64,688 of 1,793,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?