Hare's use of Hume's fork
Ethics 84 (4):332-338 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAmartya K. Sen (1966). Hume's Law and Hare's Rule. Philosophy 41 (155):75-.
A. J. Dale (1985). Hare on Supervenience: Remarks on R.M. Hare's Supervenience. Mind 94 (October):599-600.
John J. McDermott (2010). Philosophical Remarks on Peter Hare. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.
Thomas L. Carson (1986). Hare's Defense of Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Maurilio Lovatti (1994). Ethics and Reason: Richard M. Hare and Hume's Law. Per la Filosofia (31):50-56.
Wilf Backhaus (1994). Hume's Fork and Analytic/Trifling Propositions. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 8 (2):79 - 96.
Paulo A. S. Veloso, Renata P. de Freitas, Petrucio Viana, Mario Benevides & Sheila R. M. Veloso (2007). On Fork Arrow Logic and its Expressive Power. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):489 - 509.
Georges Dicker (1991). Hume's Fork Revisited. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (4):327 - 342.
Elliot David Cohen (1977). Hume's Fork. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (4):443-455.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #57,056 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
