Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):30-30 (1997)
|Abstract||Can memory be cast as a system that meshes events to actions? This commentary considers the concepts of mesh versus association, arguing that thus far the distinction is inadequate. However, the goal of shifting to an action-based view of memory has merit, most notably in emphasizing memory as a skill and in focusing on processes as opposed to structures.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Sutton (2010). Observer Perspective and Acentred Memory: Some Puzzles About Point of View in Personal Memory. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 148 (1):27 - 37.
Boris M. Velichkovsky (1997). The “Mesh” Approach to Human Memory: How Much of Cognitive Psychology has to Be Thrown Away? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):39-39.
Norman H. Anderson (1997). Functional Memory Versus Reproductive Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):19-20.
Jeffrey Blustein (2008). The Moral Demands of Memory. Cambridge University Press.
Sven Bernecker (2004). Memory and Externalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):605 - 632.
Gianfranco Dalla Barba (2000). Memory, Consciousness, and Temporality: What is Retrieved and Who Exactly is Controlling the Retrieval? In Endel Tulving (ed.), Memory, Consciousness, and the Brain: The Tallinn Conference.
Yves Rossetti & Emmanuel Procyk (1997). What Memory is for Action: The Gap Between Percepts and Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):34-36.
Marya Schechtman (2010). Memory and Identity. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):65-79.
Carl F. MacDorman (1997). Memory Must Also Mesh Affect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):29-30.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?