Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):231-231 (1999)
|Abstract||Women and men have evolved psychological traits adapted to different types of competition in the EEA (environment of evolutionary adaptedness). While women appear not to be as well adapted as men for violent status struggles, the decline of routine violence in status contests raises interesting questions about gender and status competition in contemporary societies.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
KM Kniffin (2006). Show Me the Status: Money as a Kind of Currency. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):188-+.
Charles Kurzman, Chelise Anderson, Clinton Key, Youn Ok Lee, Mairead Moloney, Alexis Silver & Maria W. Van Ryn (2007). Celebrity Status. Sociological Theory 25 (4):347 - 367.
David DeGrazia (2008). Moral Status as a Matter of Degree? Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):181-198.
Alice H. Eagly & Wendy Wood (2005). Universal Sex Differences Across Patriarchal Cultures [Not Equal] Evolved Psychological Dispositions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):281-283.
Benjamin Sachs (2011). The Status of Moral Status. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):87-104.
Joyce F. Benenson (1999). Females' Desire for Status Cannot Be Measured Using Male Definitions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):216-217.
János M. Réthelyi & Mária S. Kopp (2004). Hierarchy Disruption: Women and Men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):305-307.
Daphne Spain (1993). Gendered Spaces and Women's Status. Sociological Theory 11 (2):137-151.
John Marshall Townsend (1999). Male Dominance Hierarchies and Women's Intrasexual Competition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):235-236.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?