On the 'undialectical': normativity in Hegel [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 45 (1):121-141 (2012)
This paper addresses the question of normativity in Hegel by examining the role of ‘undialectical’ resistance to dialectical development. Beginning with a general overview of dialectical normativity and what it might mean to be ‘undialectical,’ the focus then shifts to a privileged example in Hegel’s writings: Sophocles’ Antigone. The central claim of the paper is the following: The very contradictions that fuel dialectical normativity can also trap individuals within an obsolete actuality, without immediate hope of escape. Indeed, the irreducible dependence of dialectical thinking upon the actions and decisions of individual consciousness expose it to the threat of continual stasis or regression. This ineliminable possibility of failure is what is here called the ‘undialectical’ moment of the dialectic, which Hegel understands rather as a negative condition of possibility of freedom and rationality
|Keywords||Hegel Sophocles Antigone Dialectic Reason Irrationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge University Press.
Judith Butler (2000). Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. Columbia University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1972). Hegel. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Alasdair C. MacIntyre (1976). Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Italo Testa (2009). Criticism and Normativity. Brandom and Habermas Between Kant and Hegel. In D. Canale G. Tuzet (ed.), The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy, Egea, Milano. Egea (Pp. Pp. 29-44)
Dario Perinetti (2005). History, Concepts and Normativity in Hegel. In David Carlson (ed.), Hegel's Theory of the Subject. Palgrave Macmillan
Peter Button (2007). Negativity and Dialectical Materialism: Zhang Shiying's Reading of Hegel's Dialectical Logic. Philosophy East and West 57 (1):63-82.
Wendy Lynn Clark & J. M. Fritzman (2002). Reducing Spirit to Substance. Idealistic Studies 32 (2):73-100.
Simon Lumsden (2007). Dialectic and Différance: The Place of Singularity in Hegel and Derrida. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):667-690.
Ken O'Day (1998). Normativity and Interpersonal Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):61-87.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2007). Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Claude Debru (2011). The Concept of Normativity From Philosophy to Medicine: An Overview. Medicine Studies 3 (1):1-7.
Krist Vaesen (2006). How Norms in Technology Ought to Be Interpreted. Techne 10 (1):117-133.
Stanley Moore (1971). Marx and the Origin of Dialectical Materialism1. Inquiry 14 (1-4):420-429.
Ferit Güven (2006). Hegel and the Dialectic of Racism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:51-57.
Matthew J. Smetona (2012). Marx's Inferential Commitment to Hegel's Idealism in the Grundrisse. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351-372.
Added to index2011-12-08
Total downloads12 ( #200,659 of 1,725,474 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,753 of 1,725,474 )
How can I increase my downloads?