Philosophical Studies 149 (3):602-611 (2010)
|Abstract||Although cognitive scientists have learned a lot about concepts, their findings have yet to be organized in a coherent theoretical framework. In addition, after twenty years of controversy, there is little sign that philosophers and psychologists are converging toward an agreement about the very nature of concepts. Doing without Concepts (Machery 2009) attempts to remedy this state of affairs. In this article, I review the main points and arguments developed at greater length in Doing without Concepts|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bénédicte Veillet (2012). In Defense of Phenomenal Concepts. Philosophical Papers 41 (1):97-127.
Kevan Edwards (2011). Higher-Level Concepts and Their Heterogeneous Implementations: A Polemical Review of Edouard Machery's Doing Without Concepts. Philosophical Psychology 24 (1):119-133.
Hugo Mercier (2010). How to Cut a Concept? Review of Doing Without Concepts by Edouard Machery. Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):269-277.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (1999). Concepts and Cognitive Science. In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (2010). Concepts and Theoretical Unification. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:219-220.
Barbara C. Malt (2010). Why We Should Do Without Concepts. Mind and Language 25 (5):622-633.
Edouard Machery (2009). Doing Without Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-02-27
Total downloads61 ( #15,923 of 556,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #11,112 of 556,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?