Graduate studies at Western
Argumentation 26 (2):233-265 (2012)
|Abstract||This paper shows how reasoning from best explanation combines with linguistic and factual presumptions during the process of retrieving a speaker’s intention. It is shown how differences between presumptions need to be used to pick the best explanation of a pragmatic manifestation of a dialogical intention. It is shown why we cannot simply jump to an interpretative conclusion based on what we presume to be the most common purpose of a speech act, and why, in cases of indirect speech acts, we need to depend on an abductive process of interpretation|
|Keywords||Implicatures Interpretation Presumption Argumentation Abductive reasoning Inferences Argumentation schemes Implicit meaning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton (2012). Presumptions in Legal Argumentation. Ratio Juris 25 (3):271-300.
Fabrizio Macagno (2012). Reconstructing and Assessing the Conditions of Meaningfulness. An Argumentative Approach to Presupposition. In H. Ribeiro (ed.), Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of Argumentation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Steven O. Kimbrough & Hua Hua (1991). On Nonmonotonic Reasoning with the Method of Sweeping Presumptions. Minds and Machines 1 (4):393-416.
Karen Petroski (2008). The Public Face of Presumptions. Episteme 5 (3):pp. 388-401.
Fabrizio Macagno (2011). The Presumptions of Meaning. Informal Logic 31 (4):368-394.
Fred J. Kauffeld (1998). Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing. Argumentation 12 (2):245-266.
Louis I. Katzner (1973). Presumptions of Reason and Presumptions of Justice. Journal of Philosophy 70 (4):89-100.
Douglas N. Walton (1996). Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. L. Erlbaum Associates.
J. Anthony Blair (2001). Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development. [REVIEW] Argumentation 15 (4):365-379.
F. Macagno (2010). Dialectical and Heuristic Arguments: Presumptions and Burden of Proof. In C. Tindale & C. Reed (eds.), Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning and Argument. College Publications.
Martina Faller (2012). Evidential Scalar Implicatures. Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (4):285-312.
Steffen Borge (2012). Communication, Cooperation and Conflict. ProtoSociology 29.
Steffen Borge (2012). Communication, Conflict and Cooperation. ProtoSociology 29.
Neil Sinclair (2012). Moral Realism, Face-Values and Presumptions. Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):158-179.
Added to index2012-01-16
Total downloads11 ( #107,422 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?