Qualitative health research and the irb: Answering the “so what?” With qualitative inquiry [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1):1-5 (2008)
Qualitative inquiry is increasingly used to foster change in health policy and practice. Research ethics committees often misunderstand qualitative inquiry, assuming its design can be judged by criteria of quantitative science. Traditional health research uses scientific realist standards as a means-to-an-end, answering the question “So what?” to support the advancement of practice and policy. In contrast, qualitative inquiry often draws on constructivist paradigms, generating knowledge either as an end-in-itself or as a means to foster change. When reviewers inappropriately judge qualitative inquiry, it restricts the ways health phenomena can be understood. Qualitative inquiry is necessary because it enables an understanding not possible within scientific explanation. When such research illuminates, it can also shed light onto the “So what?” In order to ensure an appraisal of qualitative inquiry congruent with its paradigmatic premises, we suggest the “Illumination Test,” met when findings foster rich understanding of phenomena, resulting in a reflective “aha!”
|Keywords||Qualitative inquiry Ethics Rigour REB/IRB|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joan M. Eakin & Eric Mykhalovskiy (2003). Reframing the Evaluation of Qualitative Health Research: Reflections on a Review of Appraisal Guidelines in the Health Sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):187-194.
Franco A. Carnevale (2005). Ethical Care of the Critically Ill Child: A Conception of a 'Thick'bioethics. Nursing Ethics 12 (3):239-252.
Judy Z. Segal (1997). Public Discourse and Public Policy: Some Ways That Metaphor Constrains Health (Care). [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 18 (4):217-231.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125-138.
Dale Hample, Bing Han & David Payne (2010). The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments. Argumentation 24 (4):405-421.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited. Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Peter J. Taylor (1994). Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
H. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128-135.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #203,013 of 1,911,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #143,244 of 1,911,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?